Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Betsy Barnum's avatar

As a former journalist and someone who uses APA and Chicago styles in my editing work, I am on the side of no spaces on the ends of em-dashes. Same for en-dashes. I'm also a convert to the serial comma, which I adamantly opposed previously, because it is standard in these academic styles. In regard to how to recognize something written by AI, I think it's more useful not to focus on mechanics like punctuation (I've always loved dashes) or even those "it's not this, but it's that" structures or other things recognized as AI patterns To me, the writing done by AI is flat. It lacks a human spark—a soul, if you will. it can sound very eloquent in the turns of phrase that it has plagiarized from wherever it learned them, but there's still a sense of something missing. A deadness, almost. No matter how well large language models learn to imitate human speech, they will never be able to imitate the human spark of creativity.

Expand full comment
Un•AI•ify's avatar

It's not em dashes that are the problem. It's writing that signals low-value.

^ and there I borrowed on a low-value (rhetorically effective) turn of phrase that's become ubiquitous with AI.

As with every type of communication, the way things are expressed influences how they are received. What is the point of communicating if how you communicate costs you your audience?

An important question.

I am a long-time em dash user and professional content creator. I don't like how em dashes are currently en vogue as a signal of AI because I know there's so much great writing (some of the best writing) that uses em dashes. I believe, though, that soon people will be looking for other Patterns (like my use of "It's not X. It's Y").

A thoughtful post. Thank you for sharing.

Expand full comment
10 more comments...

No posts